Mary Gabrielyan
November 25, 2025
17
minutes read
People see too many ads and trust too few. Cookies and broad demos no longer cut it as consent drops and privacy rules tighten. AI targeted advertising is the practical path forward: predict intent, personalize at scale, and optimize in real time with consented signals.
AI targeted advertising is moving from pilot to playbook in the US. Cookie-based tactics are losing utility, regulators keep tightening the screws, and platforms are updating policies. Marketers that treat AI targeting as a system—data, models, activation, feedback—are seeing steadier returns and fewer blind spots across social, search, display, email, OTT/CTV, retail media, and in-app.
This article explains why advertisers are moving beyond third-party cookies, defines AI targeted advertising, and shows how it lifts efficiency, personalization, and privacy. We’ll break down how it works, the core benefits, where it fits across channels, six practical best practices, and what’s next.
Digital advertising spent years relying on third-party cookies to track users across websites and serve targeted ads. This approach crumbled under multiple pressures that converged over the past several years.
Privacy legislation changed the game first. Europe's GDPR set strict boundaries on data collection, followed by comprehensive privacy laws in 20 US states by mid-2024. Regulators began treating unchecked user tracking as a liability rather than a standard practice. Consumer awareness followed closely behind—84.1% of US consumers expressed concern about online data privacy by late 2023, and behavioral data showed the impact: fewer than 1 in 5 Americans always accept cookies on websites.
Browser companies responded to user sentiment. Apple's Safari and Mozilla Firefox blocked most third-party cookies by default. Google initially committed to phasing out cookies in Chrome by 2024, though the company later reversed this specific plan, choosing instead to give users more control. Yet the direction remained clear: the infrastructure supporting traditional tracking was collapsing regardless of Google's specific timeline.
The advertising industry faced a stark reality. As one ad-tech CEO observed:
"Most of the industry has moved past the notion that cookies were good enough to target and measure advertising on the web."
Cookie deprecation forced marketers to seek alternatives that could deliver relevant ads without invasive tracking.
AI targeting emerged as the viable path forward. Instead of depending on third-party trackers that follow users across the internet, advertisers could leverage artificial intelligence to analyze behavioral patterns and contextual signals while respecting privacy boundaries. This approach uses aggregated or first-party data—information users consent to share—rather than surreptitious tracking methods.
Industry analysis noted that AI and privacy-first approaches are bringing stability to what was once a chaotic environment. The convergence of intelligent algorithms, privacy compliance, and cookie alternatives has created a more sustainable foundation for digital marketing.
⚡ Advertising had to evolve beyond cookies. Artificial intelligence provided the capability to do so effectively while maintaining user trust and regulatory compliance.
AI targeted advertising refers to using artificial intelligence algorithms to deliver ads that match specific audiences with precision. These systems analyze vast data sets to identify patterns, predict user behavior, and optimize ad placements—ensuring relevant messages reach receptive audiences at optimal moments.
This represents a significant departure from traditional targeting methods, which relied on manual rules and broad assumptions.
Traditional targeting approaches used demographic segments and rule-based logic. Advertisers chose broad categories like age ranges, gender, and location, then relied on third-party cookie data to retarget users who visited their websites. These methods were static and manual, requiring marketers to define audience parameters based on educated guesses rather than dynamic analysis.
The approach often defaulted to coarse proxies. A car manufacturer might show ads on automotive enthusiast sites, assuming everyone who visits cares about new vehicles. Standard retargeting showed the same creative to large segments regardless of individual preferences or intent signals. Precision was limited, and the heavy dependence on tracking cookies raised both privacy concerns and accuracy questions—third-party data quality was often dubious at best.
AI targeting operates differently. Machine learning algorithms automatically analyze hundreds of signals simultaneously: browsing behavior, content context, time of day, device type, previous interactions, and more. These systems use sophisticated algorithms to analyze data points and predict user intent, often uncovering micro-segments and behavioral patterns that human marketers would miss.
Consider an example: AI might learn that a user interested in hiking gear also responds positively to travel ads specifically in the evening hours. Traditional targeting would likely miss this nuanced timing and cross-category connection. The AI identifies it automatically through pattern recognition across millions of data points.
Dynamic segmentation replaces one-size-fits-all approaches. Each user can effectively become their own segment, with ad content tailored specifically to their profile. The system continuously learns and adapts rather than following fixed rules established at campaign launch.
Modern AI targeting prioritizes privacy compliance while maintaining effectiveness. These systems can operate on aggregated or anonymized data, contextual cues, or first-party data collected with explicit user consent—avoiding the problematic aspects of third-party cookie tracking.
One marketing executive explained the advantage:
"We have a more robust view of our first-party data... we're not necessarily depending on probabilistic models built on questionable third-party sources."
AI leverages consented, first-party insights to target effectively, reducing reliance on sketchy data brokers and respecting user preferences.
⚡ Privacy-first AI targeting doesn't compromise relevance—it enhances trust while delivering personalization.
This privacy-safe intelligence means ads stay relevant without compromising user identities or violating regulations. The shift represents a maturation of digital advertising from intrusive surveillance to intelligent, consent-based personalization.
Before the tactics, it helps to see the flow. AI targeting runs as a closed loop: you collect and unify consented signals, train models that turn those signals into audience and value predictions, use those predictions to decide bids, placements and creative in real time, then feed outcomes back for retraining. The four components below map to each stage so you know where to invest, what to monitor, and how improvements compound over time.
AI targeting starts with the data you’re allowed to use and the discipline to keep it clean. In practice, that means consolidating first-party behavioral data (site/app events, purchases, support interactions), zero-party inputs (preferences people volunteer), and contextual signals (page/app content, device, time, geography) into a governed store—often a CDP paired with a feature store for modeling.
Two principles keep this workable at scale: explicit consent and purpose limits on personal data, and privacy-preserving collaboration when partners are involved.
On collaboration, clean rooms have become the default. A retailer and a brand can match audiences and measure outcomes without exchanging raw identifiers, using interoperability standards and privacy-enhancing tech formalized by IAB Tech Lab’s guidance and data clean room specifications (v1.0 released in 2024, with ongoing interoperability work in 2025).
Where browser identifiers are thin, Privacy Sandbox APIs supply on-device signals: Topics API exposes a handful of coarse interests without sharing a user’s browsing history, and Protected Audience API runs remarketing auctions locally in the browser. Both are designed to preserve relevance while reducing cross-site tracking.
Done well, unification turns messy event streams into features the models can reason about: recency/frequency of visits, category affinity from content, product vectors from catalog metadata, dwell-time bands, seasonality tags, and consent flags that gate what can be activated.
The IAB’s State of Data 2025 frames the pay-off: AI now appears across the campaign lifecycle—segmentation, buying, real-time optimization, and measurement — if the underlying data is governed and fit-for-purpose.
.webp)
💡 For more on how data shapes advertising strategies, explore our article on advertising intelligence.
With features in place, supervised models score what you care about: propensity (likelihood to convert, churn, or upgrade), value (expected LTV or margin), and next-best action (the offer or product most likely to move someone forward).
Unsupervised models cluster people into micro-segments the rules never captured.
To avoid spending on outcomes that would have happened anyway, uplift models and incrementality tests estimate the causal effect of showing the ad.
Two practical anchors help here:
As you can see, the workflow is straightforward:
Once scores exist, the activation layer adjusts who sees what, at what price, and where.
In paid search and across Google’s inventory, Smart Bidding sets bids for each auction using dozens of signals (query, device, location, time, audience), and responsive assets assemble the best-performing combinations for the moment.
Performance Max extends that optimization across Search, YouTube, Display, Discover, and more under a single goal. The throughline is automation that reallocates spend continuously, not in weekly batches.
On the creative side, dynamic creative optimization (DCO) chooses or composes variants—images, copy, products—based on context and predicted response, then learns which elements work for each micro-audience.
💡 Discover more about this capability in our article on dynamic content personalization and why it drives conversions.
Put simply: the delivery system keeps trying combinations, measuring outcomes, and pushing impressions toward the pairings of audience and message that produce your KPI.
A light-touch checklist keeps this honest:
Every impression, view, click, add-to-cart, and conversion becomes training signal. That history updates models and delivery policies so the system improves with time—new cohorts emerge, stale ones decay, creative rotations adjust, and bids reflect what worked most recently.
Auction-time bidding is explicitly built for this kind of learn-and-react cycle, updating the decision per impression rather than relying on last week’s averages.
Treat this as an operating cadence, not a one-off project: refresh features on a schedule, retrain models on rolling windows, run periodic lift tests, and retire segments that have stopped adding value. The loop is the moat.
⚡ The brief sets direction; the model supplies the muscle.
AI targeting replaces brittle rules with a learning system. Models translate consented and contextual signals into probabilities, and the ad stack uses those probabilities to decide audience, message, and timing — then folds outcomes back into the model. The payoff shows up in three places: deeper personalization, tighter unit economics, and steadier results across channels.
AI turns signals into individual-level or micro-segment decisions without hand-crafting hundreds of rules. It learns which offers, formats, and sequences each person is likely to respond to, then adapts as behavior changes. When done well, personalization doesn’t just lift clicks — it moves revenue and efficiency.
McKinsey reports that effective personalization can lift revenues by 5–15% and increase marketing ROI by 10–30%, with faster-growing companies deriving 40% more revenue from personalization than slower peers.
Automation focuses spend on high-propensity users, trims wasted impressions, and reprioritizes channels and creatives while campaigns run. That matters in a flat-budget environment: Gartner’s 2025 CMO survey shows marketing budgets holding at ~7.7% of revenue, so gains must come from productivity, not larger wallets.
Among teams adopting GenAI, 77% use it for creative development, accelerating the test-and-learn cycle that feeds lower CAC and better ROAS.
With a single learning loop across environments, AI coordinates frequency, sequence, and creative so people aren’t over-exposed in one channel and ignored in another. It also helps close the gap between spend and real impact.
The ANA’s Programmatic Transparency Benchmark (Q1 2025) found only 41% of budgets reached effective impressions—up from 36% in 2023, but still a mandate to keep squeezing waste with better decisioning and supply paths.
.webp)
The core mechanics are the same everywhere — models turn signals into predictions, and delivery systems act on those predictions — but the levers differ by channel.
On social platforms, most of the targeting and delivery work is handled by the platform’s models. You set a business goal—sales, leads, app events—and the system predicts who is most likely to take that action, then allocates impressions and selects placements accordingly.
Meta’s Advantage+ is a good example: it uses AI to match ads to people most likely to respond and to automate budget and placement decisions in real time. TikTok offers App Event Optimization, which optimizes toward specific in-app outcomes like purchase or subscription rather than a generic install. These are built to improve outcomes without constant manual tweaking.
Beyond walled gardens, demand-side platforms apply similar modeling on the open web. They score each impression with dozens of signals (placement, device, time, historic response) and bid accordingly, so you pay more only when the probability of your KPI is higher. Because the open web can include low-quality supply, brands should pair automation with supply-path hygiene and log-level analysis.
The ANA’s Q1 2025 Programmatic Transparency Benchmark shows MFA spend fell from 15% (2023) to 0.4%, yet a 37.8% TrueCPM optimization gap—about $21.6B in efficiency upside—still remains, so log-level analysis and supply-path discipline are non-negotiable.
💡 Learn more: Programmatic advertising | Smart Supply integrates with AI Digital | Smart Supply.
Search has run on machine learning for years. As mentioned, Smart Bidding sets bids at auction time—per query, per user context—using signals like device, location, audience and time of day. Performance Max layers on asset automation to test and assemble creative and to extend optimization across Search, YouTube, Display and more, all against a single objective. In short: you define the outcome; the system handles per-auction pricing and asset selection at scale.
Costs do move. Independent analyses across thousands of U.S. accounts show CPCs rising in 2025, with mixed movement in cost per lead by industry—another reason to use value-based bidding and keep creative tests running so the model has stronger options to pick from.
Display is steadily shifting toward contextual AI. Instead of following people across sites, systems interpret page or app content (topic, sentiment, visual cues) and place the ad when the environment suggests higher relevance. Industry groups have documented how AI has upgraded contextual from keyword matching to semantic understanding—useful as third-party identity shrinks.
⚡ Combine contextual with first-party audiences and modeled reach to restore scale without overcollecting data.
Email remains a reliable revenue engine when it’s fueled by first-party data and predictive triggers. You can target replenishment windows, upgrade propensity, or churn risk, then let automation select the product, offer, and send-time variant most likely to land. The economics justify the effort .
Litmus’ State of Email 2025 reports many teams still realize double-digit to $50+ returns for every $1 invested in emails, with a large mid-band around $10–$36.
AI’s role is practical—choose content, assemble variants, and time delivery—while CRM models focus on who to contact and how often.
CTV now pairs big-screen impact with audience and outcome optimization. Models help extend household reach, coordinate frequency with other channels, and sequence creative, while measurement partners close the loop to site visits or sales.
The channel’s momentum is clear: eMarketer forecasts US CTV ad spending of $33.35B in 2025, up 15.8% YoY, with continued double-digit growth through the forecast horizon.
⚡ Treat CTV as part of the same optimization loop—test incrementality, manage frequency across screens, and integrate retail or commerce data when possible for closed-loop attribution.
💡 Learn more: The rise of AI in TV advertising.
Retail media brings retailer first-party purchase data to targeting and optimization—on the retailer’s properties and, increasingly, off-site via clean-room pipes.
That data advantage is why spending is expanding quickly: eMarketer expects US retail media ad spend to exceed $62B in 2025, more than $10B higher than 2024.
Use AI for product ranking, audience lookalikes, and bid strategies that optimize for sales outcomes rather than shallow engagement.
In mobile apps, AI optimizes user acquisition and in-app monetization: it identifies cohorts likely to install and retain, times rewarded video or interstitials to avoid churn, and caps frequency per user. Where device-level identifiers are limited, contextual and on-device signals combined with modeled LTV keep campaigns efficient.
⚡ When audiences are defined by consented signals and outcomes, optimization gets simpler—and performance gets steadier.
Think of AI targeting as an operating system you tune over time. Start with a small, well-measured pilot, feed it high-quality consented data, keep an eye on model drift and supply quality, pair automation with human ideas, earn trust through real controls, and centralize orchestration so the whole thing compounds.
Pick one business outcome (revenue, CAC, LTV) and design a pilot to prove incrementality, not just clicks.
Randomized lift tests make the difference: Google’s Conversion Lift and Meta’s Conversion Lift can quantify how many outcomes were caused by ads versus what would have happened anyway.
Use those results to decide where to scale—and keep a small holdout live so you don’t “learn” the wrong lesson when seasonality or promotions move the baseline.
Quality in, quality out. Build a consented first-party data spine (events, purchases, service history) and keep it clean: stable IDs, clear purpose limits, and auditable retention.
Treat collaboration (retailers, publishers, platforms) as privacy-preserving by default—use clean rooms, cohort APIs, and on-device signals where possible.
Keep policies current: by October 2025, 20 U.S. states have comprehensive privacy laws, and several new laws took effect in 2025, so consent notices and preference centers need routine updates.
Treat AI as always on. Watch for audience drift, creative fatigue, frequency overexposure, and weak supply paths—then adjust targets, exclusions, and bids.
Independent benchmarks show both progress and work to do: the ANA’s 2024 programmatic study found $439 of every $1,000 now reaches consumers and MFA spend dropped to 6.2% (median 1.1%), yet over half of spend still diverts before an ad is seen by a person—so ongoing pruning is essential.
At the quality layer, IAS’s 20th Media Quality Report shows campaigns without pre-bid protection face fraud rates up to 15× higher than those with protections in place, underscoring why pre-bid verification and post-bid monitoring matter.
Channel nuances matter too: open-programmatic CTV carried ~18% invalid traffic in the U.S. in Q1 2025, so frequency, supply-path optimization, and partner vetting are non-negotiable.
Automation can find the right audience; people still shape the idea, tone, and proof. Use generative tools to produce variants and modular building blocks, then apply brand rules, visual systems, and substantiation before anything ships.
Adoption is now broad on the creative side: the IAB’s 2025 Digital Video Ad Spend & Strategy report finds half of U.S. ad buyers already use generative AI to build video ads, with about 30% of digital video ads built or enhanced using genAI today and a rise to ~39% by 2026 expected.
Outside of video, content creation is the top AI use case among marketers (43%) in HubSpot’s 2025 State of Marketing findings, underscoring where automation most directly accelerates testing and iteration.
One caution: governance still lags—only 38% of marketing teams report formal genAI policies—so keep brand, legal, and claims checks in the loop.
Explain why someone is seeing an ad and what’s in it for them. Offer choices—topic opt-outs, lighter frequency, and easy data preferences—and keep an internal log of “Why this ad?” explanations for audit.
Consumer sentiment backs the need: recent eMarketer analysis highlights AI transparency and mishandling personal data as top social concerns; privacy tools (like VPNs) are common responses to perceived overreach.
⚡ Earn trust with clear value exchange and visible controls.
Use a single orchestration layer to plan, execute, and measure across channels, then pair it with curated, KPI-driven supply so your optimization work actually lands on quality impressions.
Elevate is AI Digital’s DSP-agnostic intelligence layer built for planning, optimization, and insights across multiple platforms.
In planning, the AI planning assistant can draft a workable media plan from historical patterns in about 30 seconds, while the predictive planning engine forecasts reach and outcomes and suggests budget splits before launch.
Once live, Elevate runs real-time optimization—including budget reallocation and smart bidding—and prioritizes changes using an Impact Score that evaluates 15+ variables and refreshes every 15 minutes.
It also aligns bidding to custom KPIs (e.g., ROAS, CAC, LTV) rather than generic media metrics, and exposes performance through Ask Elevate, a conversational analytics assistant, plus multi-touch attribution for cross-channel credit.
All of this sits in the Open Garden approach: neutral, cross-platform, with full transparency.
Smart Supply is outcome-first supply selection and SPO. It filters low-quality inventory up front, removes bid-stream recycling and extra hops that inflate CPMs, applies IVT protection, and routes buys through direct SSP paths—so more budget reaches working media.
Deals are custom-built to your KPI (not one-size-fits-all), can be issued quickly, and run DSP-agnostically across display, streaming video, CTV, and audio.
The result: higher viewability, lower fraud exposure, and better engagement on the impressions your optimizer is fighting to win.
Elevate decides what to do next—plan, allocate, test, and reallocate against a business KPI—}while Smart Supply ensures those decisions land on unbiased, high-quality paths with transparent economics. Together, they cut waste, preserve control, and keep the feedback loop tight from plan to outcome.
The next phase of targeting is less about tracking people across the open web and more about predicting intent from consented and contextual signals, then acting on those predictions without exposing identities. Three shifts make this possible: privacy-preserving addressability, generative creative that adapts on the fly, and model-based measurement that proves incremental value even when user-level identifiers are scarce. Let’s talk about each of those in detail below.
Clean rooms are moving from niche to default for audience building and closed-loop reporting. As mentioned, Tech Lab published v1.0 guidance and the first interoperability standard in 2024 and has continued expanding the portfolio through 2025.
At the browser level, Privacy Sandbox APIs put more decisioning on-device: Topics offers coarse, recent interest categories without revealing specific sites, and Protected Audience (formerly FLEDGE) runs remarketing auctions in the browser so third parties can’t track cross-site behavior.
Expect more targeting to happen locally, with fewer raw identifiers leaving the device.
In parallel, brands are testing universal IDs (e.g., UID2, RampID) alongside ID-less techniques like curated audiences (the IAB Tech Lab spec formerly known as Seller-Defined Audiences).
The practical future is mixed: durable IDs where there’s consent and value, cohorts/context when there isn’t, all stitched together by modeling.
Dynamic creative won’t just select from a menu of assets; it will generate variants that fit the viewer and the moment — under brand guardrails.
Both Google and Meta have shipped genAI tools into their ad stacks (e.g., Performance Max creative upgrades with Gemini; Meta’s expanding image/variation features), with labeling and safety controls.
This doesn’t replace creative direction; it gives the optimizer far more viable options to test.
MMM is being rebuilt for a privacy-first world. Google’s Meridian and Meta’s Robyn bring transparent, reproducible MMM to teams that need always-on budget guidance without user-level logs.
Pair these models with regular lift experiments where practical; together they create a feedback system that can steer spend even as identifiers fade.
As more decisions are made by models, advertisers will need to document how systems work and why people see certain messages.
NIST’s AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0 and its genAI profile) is becoming a common reference for transparency, explainability, bias management, and ongoing monitoring.
On the ad-tech side, IAB Tech Lab’s 2025 roadmap and transparency tooling (e.g., Transparency Center; evolving privacy protocols like GPP updates) point to a more verifiable supply chain.
As mentioned, two channels keep compounding and will pressure teams to get targeting and measurement right.
Meanwhile, budgets are not expanding to cover experimentation—CMO budgets remain ~7.7% of revenue in 2025—so efficiency and provable incrementality are the bar.
Start with the foundations that compound: cleaner signals, tighter measurement, and clear guardrails. The steps below are sequenced so each strengthens the next—addressability first, then creative scale, always-on measurement, and governance:
💡 Further reading: The future is now: how AI Digital embraces AI technologies | AI in DSPs.
Cookie-era tactics are fading. What endures is a system that learns: consented signals feed models, models guide activation, and outcomes flow back to improve the next decision. Teams that build around this loop see steadier ROI, tighter control over privacy, and clearer attribution.
At AI Digital, we see targeting becoming model-native and outcome-first:
In practice, this looks like an operating system for media: objectives and constraints in at the top; rapid reallocation, frequency control, and creative iteration out the other side.
If you’re ready to turn AI targeting into an operating system for growth, explore what we do and get in touch—we can audit a live account, map the data spine, and design a pilot that proves incremental value before you scale.
.svg)
.svg)
Inefficiency
Description
Use case
Description of use case
Examples of companies using AI
Ease of implementation
Impact
Audience segmentation and insights
Identify and categorize audience groups based on behaviors, preferences, and characteristics
Automated ad campaigns
Automate ad creation, placement, and optimization across various platforms
Brand sentiment tracking
Monitor and analyze public opinion about a brand across multiple channels in real time
Campaign strategy optimization
Analyze data to predict optimal campaign approaches, channels, and timing
Content strategy
Generate content ideas, predict performance, and optimize distribution strategies
Personalization strategy development
Create tailored messaging and experiences for consumers at scale
Yes. Most ad platforms (Google, Meta, TikTok) include built-in optimization, so you can start with a single, goal-based campaign and first-party signals (site tags, conversion events). Keep it simple: one KPI, a modest test budget, and a clear lift test.
Outcome-driven campaigns — ecommerce sales, qualified leads, app installs, and CTV prospecting with site-visit/sales optimization. Retail media also performs well because it pairs targeting with closed-loop sales measurement.
It can be — if you anchor on consented first-party data, minimize identifiers, and use privacy-preserving collaboration (clean rooms, cohort/context APIs). Give users clear controls and document how your models make decisions.
Pick one channel and one KPI, set up accurate conversion tracking, and run a small A/B or geo-split test to prove incrementality. Then add creative variants, expand audiences, and scale only where lift is verified.
Track incrementality (lift), cost per outcome (CPA/CAC), revenue/ROAS, LTV:CAC, and frequency/overlap. For CRM/email, include revenue per send and retention; for CTV, add site-visit or sales lift tied to exposed vs. control.
AI targeted marketing is the broader practice — using AI to personalize the entire customer journey (site/app experiences, email/CRM, product recommendations, pricing, retention). AI targeted advertising is a subset focused on paid media: using AI to decide who sees an ad, what message they get, and when/where it runs. In short: marketing = whole lifecycle; advertising = paid placements.
AI powered advertising covers any AI in the ad workflow — creative generation, budget pacing, bid optimization, fraud/suitability checks, measurement/attribution, MMM—plus targeting. AI targeted advertising is narrower: AI specifically used to select audiences and match messages/timing to hit an objective.
