TV Media Buying in 2025–2026: Definition, Process, Costs, and Winning Strategies
Mary Gabrielyan
September 12, 2025
21
minutes read
TV media buying now spans broadcast, cable, and streaming screens—where planning, pricing, and measurement finally converge. Streaming accounts for nearly half of U.S. TV viewing, yet live sports still rule the biggest audiences, which keeps television media buying central to brand scale.
TV ad buying has entered a practical new phase: one plan, many screens, shared accountability. For marketers, the job is no longer just slotting a media buy on linear schedules. It’s managing converged television—broadcast, cable, and CTV—so reach, targeting, frequency, and outcomes work in concert. Streaming’s weight is undeniable: in July 2025, it represented nearly half of total TV viewing time in the U.S., according to Nielsen’s The Gauge.
Budgets have followed. The IAB’s 2025 video spend outlook shows digital video (CTV, online video, social video) commanding close to 60% of U.S. TV/video ad spend, cementing the shift toward impression-based planning and cross-platform reporting.At the same time, live sports dominate U.S. television’s top telecasts—the NFL accounted for 72 of the 100 most-watched broadcasts in 2024—so premium linear still anchors big-reach strategies.
You’ll also see a clearer path on measurement and currencies. Nielsen’s big data + panel approach has renewed accreditation, while alternative currencies like VideoAmp, iSpot, and Comscore continue to gain certification and usage across deals. We’ll show how to apply them without overcomplicating your post-buys.
This guide is written for marketers, media planners, and business leaders who want a practical, current view of TV media buying and television media buying—from definitions and buying types to pricing models, optimization, and safeguards.
💡 If you want a quick primer on TV fundamentals first, start here: TV advertising. Then come back for details that matter in 2025–2026.
What is TV media buying?
TV media buying is the process of purchasing advertising inventory across linear TV (broadcast and cable) and streaming environments (CTV/OTT and vMVPDs) to reach a defined audience at an agreed price within a fixed time frame. A TV media buyer translates campaign goals into audience definitions, reach and frequency targets, and a mix of inventory sources, then negotiates rates and terms, activates the plan, and stewards delivery through to final reporting.
At its core, television media buying is about matching available supply (programs, dayparts, streams, and ad pods) with predictable demand (your audience, budget, and timing) while managing risk on price, delivery, and quality. Buyers use different deal structures—upfront, scatter, programmatic guaranteed, private marketplace, and open auction—to balance cost efficiency, flexibility, and control. Success is measured on delivery (impressions/GRPs), effectiveness (incremental reach, lift, response), and quality (brand suitability, fraud-free supply, accurate currency).
💬 Upfront commitments buy certainty; programmatic buys add control. The best plans use both.
Key concepts you’ll see referenced throughout:
Units and currencies: impressions/CPM, ratings/GRPs/CPP, and outcome or attention-based KPIs.
Inventory types: national network, cable, local/spot, addressable linear, AVOD/FAST, and premium CTV.
Contracts and artifacts: RFPs, proposals, insertion orders, deal IDs, makegoods, and post-buys.
Safeguards: verification, frequency management, blocklists/allowlists, brand safety, and compliance checks.
How TV media buying works in advertising
Below is the practical flow most teams follow from brief to post-buy. In converged TV, some steps are concurrent, but the logic stays the same.
Translate the brief into audience and KPIs: Define who you must reach (demo, behavioral, geographic), how often, and what constitutes success (e.g., effective reach at 3+ exposures, incremental reach over social video, site lift, or sales lift).
Build a cross-screen supply strategy: Choose the blend of linear (for predictable mass reach) and CTV/OTT (for precision and control). Decide where you need guarantees (upfront/programmatic guaranteed) versus flexibility (scatter/PMP/open exchange).
Forecast reach, frequency, and delivery: Use planning tools to model expected unique reach and total frequency across sources. Set guardrails for max frequency and define what counts as incremental reach.
Negotiate price and terms: Issue RFPs, compare proposals on CPM/CPP, audience index, pod position, and added value. For programmatic, set floors, bid strategies, inventory lists, and frequency caps. Lock cancellation windows, makegood rules, and measurement currency in writing.
Traffic creative and launch: Clear creative with standards & practices, deliver assets/specs, map copy to placements, and verify tags. In streaming, upload assets to the DSP/ad server and attach targeting and deal IDs.
Verify, pace, and optimize in-flight: Monitor delivery vs. plan, frequency distribution, incremental reach, and brand suitability/fraud checks. Reallocate budget from underperforming sources, rotate creative, and adjust dayparts or audiences as needed.
Reconcile and report: Confirm that impressions/GRPs and currency guarantees were met; claim makegoods if required. Deliver a post-buy that covers delivery, incremental reach, cost efficiency, and outcome KPIs—with learnings for the next flight.
💬 What good looks like: clear objective → audience-first plan → diversified deal mix → defensible pricing → clean delivery → measurable outcomes.
Media buying vs media planning
These disciplines are tightly connected but not the same. Planning sets the strategy; buying executes it with commercial and operational rigor.
💬 Planning chooses the why and who; buying owns the how, where, and how much.
In practice, the best outcomes happen when planners and buyers work as a single converged TV team: planners frame the strategy and measurement, while buyers engineer the market mechanics—pricing, inventory access, and live optimization—to hit the plan’s goals with precision.
The evolving role of TV media buying in 2026
TV buying has shifted from channel-by-channel tactics to converged planning across linear, cable, and CTV, with budgets and measurement following suit.
As mentioned, streaming now commands nearly half of U.S. TV viewing time and continues to set monthly records. Meanwhile, digital video is set to account for 58–60% of total U.S. TV/video ad spend in 2025, reflecting a decisive move to impression-based deals and cross-screen reporting.
Total TV and streaming snapshot, July 2025 (Source)
💡 For a broader view of where this is heading, see AI Digital’s outlook on media trends 2025.
TV in the modern media mix (CTV, linear, digital integration)
The practical mix today looks like this:
Linear for fast, predictable reach and live events;
CTV for precision, control, and incremental reach;
Digital video and social for frequency shaping and action.
Sports still anchor national scale—the NFL accounted for 72 of the top 100 telecasts in 2024, while Super Bowl LIX reached 127.7 million viewers across platforms, the biggest single-network telecast on record.
As buyers stitch screens together, deduplicated reach and frequency become the operating metrics, yet only 32% of marketers say they can measure media holistically across traditional and digital channels, underscoring why currency and methodology choices matter in 2026.
Share of marketers measuring digital and traditional media holistically (Source)
📌 What this means for planning: build a base of guaranteed reach (upfronts or programmatic guaranteed), then layer CTV and online video for audience precision and incremental reach. Use one currency for transactions and a cross-platform system for deduped reporting.
Advantages of buying TV ad inventory
TV delivers several durable advantages that are hard to replicate elsewhere:
Scale and cultural impact. Live tentpoles (especially the NFL) still deliver audiences in the tens of millions, creating immediate national reach and shared moments that lift brands.
Premium context and high on-screen attention. CTV environments typically meet or exceed MRC viewability thresholds, and premium linear programming avoids many pitfalls of UGC adjacency. Verification on CTV is now standard.
Targeting and control. CTV and addressable options let you activate first- and third-party segments, cap frequency, and optimize mid-flight—without abandoning the broad reach of national linear. The budget shift toward digital video confirms buyers are leaning into this precision.
US OTT, pay TV, and YouTube viewers forecast 2025 (Source)
Key challenges advertisers face
Even with those strengths, three issues demand rigor:
Fragmentation and frequency waste. The same viewer can encounter your ad across apps, devices, and distributors. Studies show purchase intent can drop ~16% when viewers see the same ad six times in a short span, making cross-platform frequency management essential.
Supply path complexity and transparency. The same CTV impression can be resold through multiple intermediaries, obscuring quality and inflating fees. Buyers are turning to SPO strategies and direct pipes to publisher ad servers to shorten paths and regain control.
Measurement and currency sprawl.Nielsen dominates guarantees, while VideoAmp and iSpot bring big-data detail. Testing multiple systems is common—but without a clear primary and secondary standard, post-buy reporting gets complicated fast.
Brand safety and CTV fraud. Bot activity and opaque apps create risk. Recent reports highlight sophisticated CTV bot variants and show how optimized, verified campaigns materially reduce fraud exposure. Treat verification and allowlists as non-negotiable.
💡 If you want help designing a converged TV plan that addresses these four risks while pushing for incremental reach and outcome accountability, see how we can help at AI Digital | what we do.
Types of TV media buying
Below are the main paths to TV inventory. Each balances certainty, flexibility, and control differently—use the mix that fits your goals and risk tolerance.
Upfronts and Digital NewFronts
Annual advance commitments with TV networks and major streaming publishers. You reserve inventory for the broadcast year or a streaming slate, often tied to priority programs and dayparts.
Best for: guaranteed access to high-demand programming and predictable national reach over multiple quarters.
Pricing & guarantees: impression or GRP deals with audience guarantees and makegoods; rates are negotiated once and often beat scatter.
Watchouts: limited flexibility to shift budgets; cancellation windows are constrained, so plan contingencies.
Tip: lock your primary currency (plus a secondary verification view) in the IO, and negotiate pod position or sponsorship value while leverage is highest.
Scatter buying
Quarter-by-quarter buying of unsold or newly released inventory after the upfront.
Best for: agility around launches, competitive moves, and late-breaking content opportunities.
Pricing & guarantees: market-driven CPMs that can run higher than upfront in tight periods; delivery can still be guaranteed, but terms vary.
Watchouts: availability risk for marquee content; faster decisions and close pacing oversight are required.
Tip: keep a hybrid posture—secure a guaranteed base, then layer scatter for opportunistic reach.
Remnant inventory
Last-minute or surplus spots sold at discounted CPMs across linear, CTV, and FAST channels.
Best for: cost-efficient reach extension and light testing of new dayparts or channels.
Pricing & guarantees: discounted, dynamic CPMs with limited placement control; guarantees are rare and delivery windows can be narrow.
Watchouts: less control over context, pod position, and timing; not ideal for brand-sensitive flights.
Tip: use allowlists, suitability filters, and sensible frequency caps; treat remnant as a top-up, not the foundation.
Programmatic TV buying (dynamic pricing, targeting)
Automated, data-driven buying of CTV/OTT and, increasingly, addressable and linear supply via DSPs and private marketplaces.
Best for: audience precision with first- or third-party data, and mid-flight control of creative rotation, dayparting, and budgets.
Pricing & guarantees: dynamic CPMs via auctions or programmatic guaranteed; targeted impressions cost more but cut waste.
Watchouts: supply-path complexity can inflate costs without curation; robust verification is essential for brand safety and fraud prevention.
Tip: consolidate spend into curated PMPs with clear app/channel disclosure, set global frequency caps, and align measurement early (transaction currency + cross-screen deduped view).
💬 Plan for certainty, budget for flexibility, and use programmatic to fine-tune.
The TV media buying process: How to buy TV advertising
A solid TV media buying program moves in a straight line: define the audience and KPIs, model reach and frequency across screens, negotiate inventory and terms, traffic the creative correctly, then monitor delivery and outcomes with enough discipline to improve results mid-flight.
💡 If you’d like a quick refresher on formats and inventory basics, this primer on cable TV advertising is useful context.
Researching audiences and markets
Begin with a brief that’s specific about outcomes. Decide whether you must deliver unique reach at a minimum exposure level, qualified site/store actions, or sales lift. Translate that goal into an audience you can actually buy—move beyond age–sex to behaviors, geography, and any first-party segments suitable for addressable TV or CTV.
From there, build a view of where that audience is easiest to reach across linear and streaming. Model deduplicated reach and the frequency you’ll need to be effective; set sensible caps on CTV so you don’t fatigue the same households.
Finally, name your measurement stack early: pick a transaction currency for stewardship and a cross-screen system for deduped reach/frequency so reporting won’t fragment later.
💬 Define the audience in data, then buy the audience across screens—not the other way around.
Negotiating with networks and platforms
Turn the plan into comparable proposals. Issue RFPs that specify audience, delivery, pricing unit, and any placement needs such as pod position or sponsorships. Compare responses on one yardstick—CPM/CPP, daypart mix, audience index, cancellation windows, and how makegoods will be handled if delivery falls short.
For streaming, set guardrails up front: which apps or channels are allowed, what disclosure you’ll receive, how frequency will be capped, and what reporting cadence you expect.
Many advertisers secure a guaranteed base (upfronts or programmatic guaranteed), hold a modest reserve for scatter, and use curated CTV deals for targeted amplification.
Creative and message alignment
Match the message to the placement and the viewer’s context. Map assets to the plan: 15s/30s/60s for linear; VAST-compliant files for CTV; short variations for sequential messaging.
Clear every cut with standards and practices, confirm substantiation and disclaimers, and meet loudness/captioning requirements.
If you expect higher exposure bands, rotate creative to prevent wear-out.
Purchasing ad slots and inventory
Execution looks different by channel, but the goal is the same—precise delivery against the agreed currency.
For linear, finalize insertion orders with flight dates, dayparts, impression or GRP guarantees, and clear makegood terms; confirm copy deadlines and traffic instructions with each network or station group, and record any adjacency requests (first-in-pod, separation from competitors).
For CTV and addressable, set up campaigns in your DSP or publisher platform using deal IDs and curated marketplaces, apply global frequency caps and pacing rules, and enforce allowlists, fraud filtering, and brand-suitability profiles.
In both cases, make sure billing metrics align with the currency named in the contract and that vendor reports reconcile cleanly.
Tracking, reporting, and campaign optimization
Stewardship is where television media buying earns its keep. Monitor delivery against plan, pacing by partner and daypart, on-target percentage, and the shape of your frequency distribution. Verify quality continuously—invalid-traffic rates, suitability issues, unexpected apps or channels—and keep an eye on creative rotation for early signs of fatigue. When something underdelivers, move quickly:
Shift weight to partners or dayparts that add incremental reach without spiking frequency.
Tune bid floors or priorities in CTV and expand/tighten allowlists as evidence dictates.
Refresh creative for heavy-frequency households while you redirect spend toward fresher audiences.
At wrap, reconcile currency delivery and claim makegoods where warranted. Report incremental reach, cost efficiency, and outcome KPIs alongside clear learnings and tests to roll into the next flight. This habit—measure, adjust, document—turns tv ad buying from a procurement exercise into a repeatable growth lever.
Costs and pricing models
Pricing in TV media buying has largely converged on impressions, even when you transact linear placements. You’ll still see legacy CPP and GRP language in proposals, but most deals in 2025–2026 clear on CPM, which makes it easier to compare linear, cable, and CTV on one footing. Streaming supply keeps expanding (new AVOD tiers, FAST channels, and major publishers adding ad time), which has pushed CPMs down from their pandemic-era peaks; at the same time, premium live events and high-demand programming continue to command significant premiums.
CPM, CPP, and other pricing metrics
CPM (cost per thousand impressions) is the default pricing unit across converged TV. A national buy might clear near the low-30s CPM on average across the market, with meaningful variation by content, audience, and timing.
For 2025–26, primetime upfronts settled at roughly $31B, with $17.8B in linear commitments and $13.2B in streaming. Average adult 30s CPMs eased again:
broadcast $43.50 (−4.1% YoY),
cable $19.35 (−6.8%), and
streaming $27.25 (−7.6%).
Softer rates reflect more streaming GRP supply (higher ad loads and FAST growth), while strong sports kept linear from sliding further. Practically, buyers get a bit more room on rate: keep a guaranteed base for scale, then use CTV to add precision and incremental reach.
CPP (cost per point) ties price to a rating point in a given demo and is still common in linear negotiations and post-buys, especially for local/spot. It converts cleanly to CPM once the demo universe is defined, but CPM remains the more practical cross-screen unit for planning and reconciliation.
You’ll also encounter fixed unit rates for unique events and integrations. The Super Bowl is the most prominent example, where 30-second units have recently been priced around $7–8 million and are reportedly moving to $8 million for 2026 inventory. These are negotiated as flat fees rather than CPMs and include custom placement considerations.
Other units still appear in streaming and direct-response contexts—CPCV (cost per completed view), vCPM (viewable CPM), and occasionally CPA/ROAS frameworks for outcome-based guarantees on select partners—but CPM is the common denominator for most converged TV buys.
💬 Transact on CPM for apples-to-apples planning. Use CPP and unit rates where they genuinely add precision.
Factors that affect TV media costs
Pricing moves with supply, demand, and the quality of the audience you’re buying. A few levers matter most.
Seasonality and demand spikes raise CPMs. Q4 retail and the sports calendar increase competition; big event windows (NFL playoffs, March Madness, Olympics) can lift rates in adjacent programming as well.
Context and format carry premiums. Live sports and first-run prime command higher prices; first-in-pod or A-pod positions cost more than late-break positions. CTV typically has fewer ad minutes per hour than linear, which concentrates demand into scarcer pods on premium services.
Audience definition changes the math. Broad A18–49 or A25–54 on national linear tends to be cheaper per thousand than addressable impressions against a high-value segment. Adding first-party or purchase-based targets on CTV will raise CPMs but can lower waste.
Deal structure matters. Upfronts often secure better base pricing (and placement) than last-minute buys; scatter can be opportunistic but volatile. In 2024-25 upfronts, buyers pushed linear CPMs down modestly while also negotiating more competitive streaming pricing, illustrating how timing and leverage shape outcomes.
Finally, macro conditions and competition influence rates. As major streamers add ad tiers, total premium streaming inventory rises, while measurement assurance (e.g., currency accreditation) can also affect perceived value and pricing confidence.
Budgeting for TV campaigns
Start with what you must accomplish, then back into the mix and money:
If your goal is fast national reach, establish a guaranteed linear or programmatic-guaranteed base and model the incremental reach CTV can add at realistic CPMs.
If your goal is precision against a narrow segment, expect higher CPMs on addressable and targeted CTV and size the pool first to avoid hitting frequency ceilings too soon.
A practical pattern for many U.S. advertisers is a converged allocation that leans on linear for scale and CTV for control. In 2025, some planning benchmarks show budgets still weighted toward linear, with roughly one-third on CTV; the exact split should reflect your category, creative assets, and the role TV plays in your broader plan.
When you build the working budget, include three guardrails:
Effective reach target and frequency cap. Set a minimum effective reach (e.g., 60–70% of the target at 3+ exposures) and a cross-screen frequency ceiling. Price out the plan at the transaction currency you’ll use for makegoods and reconciliation.
Flex reserve. Hold back a portion of spend for scatter or short-notice CTV opportunities so you can follow performance or respond to competitors. The 2024-25 upfront cycles showed why optionality pays when streaming supply shifts and pricing resets.
Quality and verification costs. Budget for brand suitability, fraud filtering, and third-party verification on CTV. These small line items protect ROI and keep you out of low-quality supply paths.
Close with a sanity check. Compare your modeled all-in CPM (media + verification + data fees) to historic campaigns, confirm you can deliver the required reach without saturating frequency, and validate that the measurement stack—currency for delivery, plus a cross-screen system for deduplicated reach—can support the post-buy you’ll need to make decisions next quarter.
Measurement & currencies (must-know in 2025/26)
Don’t buy impressions until measurement is clear. One currency for delivery, another for reach, both secured in the IO for clean reconciliation. Let’s break it down step by step.
Currency status (Nielsen ONE, VideoAmp, iSpot)
By 2025, currency choice is no longer a single-answer question. As mentioned, the Media Rating Council accreditedNielsen’s Big Data + Panel national TV measurement in January 2025, making it the first MRC-accredited hybrid panel–big data currency for national TV. Nielsen is also phasing out panel-only ratings by late 2025, further centering transactions on the hybrid product.
Alongside Nielsen, the U.S. Joint Industry Committee (JIC)reaffirmedVideoAmp, iSpot, and Comscore as certified currencies following its mid-term audit for the 2025–2026 season, expanding Comscore’s status to include personified demographics. In practice, that means buyers and sellers can transact on multiple accredited or certified options, often naming a primary currency for guarantees and a secondary dataset for validation and planning.
What to do with this multi-currency reality: establish your primary transaction currency in the IO, define the reconciliation rules up front, and align your post-buy with a cross-screen system that your internal stakeholders already trust.
Cross-platform deduplication and frequency management
Cross-screen reporting is moving from aspiration to table stakes. Nielsen ONE Ads delivers deduplicated reach and frequency across linear and digital (including YouTube CTV), giving planners a single view of unique audience and overlap. Still, most marketers aren’t there yet.
Two practical snags remain. First, co-viewing: determining how many people were actually in the room. Agencies cite co-viewing as a persistent blocker for accurate effectiveness measurement, and trade press continues to flag the modeling gaps. Second, supply-path sprawl in CTV can produce duplicate exposure across apps and devices unless you actively manage caps and identity.
A workable approach is simple: buy and measure in one primary system when you can; insist on app or channel disclosure for CTV; set a global frequency ceiling across partners; and use a deduped reach report as the optimization source of truth each week.
KPIs and methodologies
Delivery metrics still matter—impressions, on-target percentage, GRPs, effective reach at 3+—but buyers are weighting business outcomes more heavily. IAB’s video ad spend work shows outcomes like sales, store visits, and site actions now sit atop the KPI stack, with reach and frequency close behind. Use delivery for stewardship and outcomes for decision-making.
Quality and attention measures are maturing. The IAB/MRC Attention Measurement Guidelines (May 2025, open for public comment) outline common definitions and reporting principles so “attention” can be applied as a supplementary signal, not a replacement for delivery or outcomes. Treat attention as a diagnostic layer to improve placement and creative rotation, especially in streaming.
Methodologically, pair currency delivery with one consistent, cross-screen deduped view (e.g., Nielsen ONE Ads or a certified alternative), then add experiment design on top: incrementality tests to isolate lift; brand lift for upper-funnel readouts; and MMM for long-term ROI. Expect to reconcile co-viewing assumptions and device graphs along the way—clarify them in your SOW so your QBR doesn’t devolve into methodology debates.
TV media buying strategies for advertisers
Great TV media buying is about making each impression serve a clear objective, then orchestrating linear and CTV so reach, precision, and outcomes add up. The strategies below are pragmatic and repeatable.
Aligning media buys with campaign goals
Start by deciding what TV must achieve for the business and write it down as a short ladder:
awareness (unique reach at a minimum effective frequency),
consideration (site or store actions), or
sales/profit (incremental lift).
That ladder drives everything: audience definitions, the mix of linear and CTV, the currency you transact on, and the KPIs you’ll report.
If you’re launching at national scale, secure a guaranteed base where delivery is predictable, then layer precision only where it adds incremental reach or a measurable response.
If the goal is a narrow segment outcome, change the order: size the addressable audience first so you don’t oversaturate, then use lighter linear weight for air cover.
Two guardrails keep plans honest: define an effective reach target you’re unwilling to compromise, and name the measurement stack before any RFPs go out (transaction currency plus the cross-screen system you’ll use to judge deduplicated reach and frequency).
💬 Strategy is choosing which impressions not to buy, so your budget funds the ones that move the needle.
Targeting and segmentation opportunities
Modern television media buying lets you go well beyond age–sex. Use first-party data when you can (CRM, site, or app audiences activated through privacy-safe onboarding) and supplement with robust third-party segments for intent or category purchase.
In practice, the most dependable pattern pairs broad, low-waste linear reach with addressable or CTV segments that warrant higher CPMs because they remove obvious waste.
Version your creative to match those segments: new customers see a narrative spot; high-propensity households see an offer or local incentive. Set minimum audience sizes so you don’t burn frequency on tiny pools, and test one or two high-value segments per flight rather than slicing into dozens you can’t measure cleanly.
A small, focused list can help here:
Prioritize segments tied to business value (loyalty members, high LTV, in-market signals).
Require app/channel transparency for CTV so you know where those segments are seeing you.
Balancing reach and frequency
The job is to maximize unique reach at an effective exposure level while avoiding wasteful repetition.
Model deduplicated reach across linear and CTV before launch, then monitor the live frequency distribution each week.
If the tail of high-frequency viewers grows, rotate creative rather than pushing more weight through the same pipes.
If incremental reach stalls, shift impressions to publishers or dayparts with lower overlap, or expand curated CTV supply while holding a global cap.
Small moves often have outsized impact: moving a fraction of prime weight into sports shoulder programming, or trading one crowded CTV app for a curated bundle with fresher audience, can restore reach without inflating cost.
Treat TV as the engine that creates demand and your digital stack as the capture system. Plan TV and digital together so frequency complements rather than collides, and so creative tells a coherent story across screens.
Simple integrations work best: a short URL or QR cue on the TV spot, coordinated search and retail media bursts during TV flight weeks, and privacy-safe retargeting of exposed households with mid-funnel messages.
When TV drives a response, suppress further CTV impressions to those households and spend the next dollar on incremental reach instead.
Above all, keep decision rights clear. Name who can shift weight between linear and CTV mid-flight, how quickly, and based on which metrics. When the team knows the rules, you can adapt in days, not weeks—and that’s often the difference between a good tv ad buying plan and a great one.
Tools and partners for effective TV media buying
The strongest TV media buying programs blend seasoned partners with a modern toolset. Think in three layers: who negotiates and stewards the media, who measures and verifies delivery and outcomes, and what automation you use to keep the plan efficient while it’s live.
Media buying agencies and partners
Agencies remain the primary operating system for television media buying. They translate business objectives into audience definitions, negotiate pricing and terms at scale, and manage day-to-day stewardship—from trafficking and copy rotation to makegoods and reconciliation.
For national brands, holding-company trading power can secure access to premium inventory and better pod positions; for growth marketers, specialist shops and self-serve platforms offer faster cycles and tighter feedback loops.
💡 If you prefer a partner that can integrate planning, buying, analytics, and optimization under one roof, explore how we work with advertisers at AI Digital.
A useful way to evaluate partners is simple: ask how they will guarantee clean app or channel disclosure in CTV; how they manage cross-screen frequency; which currency they will transact on and why; and how quickly they can reallocate spend when performance diverges from plan.
TV measurement and analytics platforms
A converged plan needs two kinds of measurement:
First, a transaction currency to steward delivery and settle the buy.
Second, a cross-platform view that reconciles linear and streaming so you can manage deduplicated reach, frequency, and incremental impact.
Many advertisers pair a currency provider with one or more analytics partners for brand lift, incrementality, and attribution.
Identity resolution and data onboarding vendors (for example, those that connect first-party audiences to TV households in a privacy-safe way) round out the stack and make targeted and addressable TV practical at scale.
When you assess vendors, focus less on feature lists and more on fit: does the methodology match your KPI ladder; can you get log-level transparency for CTV; and will the outputs be trusted by finance when you present ROI.
Role of AI and automation in media buying
Automation is no longer a sidecar. It plans, protects, and optimizes the buy while it runs.
On the planning side, machine-learning models forecast reach and overlap across screens and surface the mixes most likely to hit effective frequency without waste.
In execution, automated systems watch pacing, frequency distribution, and quality signals, then shift weight toward placements that add incremental reach or stronger outcomes.
In CTV, supply-path optimization and curated marketplaces reduce duplication and improve transparency. Creative rotation can also be automated so heavy-frequency households see fresh variants rather than the same cut repeatedly.
If you’re consolidating this into a single workflow, start with curated inventory and global frequency caps, then layer automation where it moves the needle most: budget rebalancing, anomaly detection, and outcome-guided bidding.
Compliance starts with the law, then extends to platform rules and your own risk tolerance. On television, you’re responsible for truthful, non-misleading claims and for meeting category-specific rules (for example, fair balance in pharma).
The FTC makes this baseline explicit: ad claims must be truthful, not deceptive or unfair, and substantiated when appropriate. The FCC enforces additional broadcast standards, including the CALM Act’s requirement that commercials maintain the same average loudness as surrounding programming. Build these obligations into creative review and network clearance so issues are resolved before traffic.
Brand safety is more nuanced. Linear environments remain curated, but connected TV introduces risks familiar from digital: spoofed apps, opaque supply paths, and varying content suitability. Treat verification and supply hygiene as part of the media buy, not an optional add-on:
Start by insisting that publishers and intermediaries implement app-ads.txt and sellers.json for CTV so you can verify authorized sellers and reduce spoofing.
Complement that with TAG certifications (Certified Against Fraud, Brand Safety Certified) across partners, which signal adherence to industry best practices for invalid-traffic mitigation and malware controls.
Finally, align your suitability settings to an established schema such as the (now archived but still widely referenced) GARM Brand Safety Floor + Suitability Framework to avoid inconsistent internal definitions and reduce adjacency surprises.
A second layer is transparency in programmatic supply.Independent studies of the open web have shown material waste when supply paths aren’t curated, and similar dynamics can appear in CTV without disciplined controls. Shorten the chain wherever possible (direct deals and curated PMPs), require app or channel-level disclosure, and document IVT thresholds and make-good remedies in your IOs.
Privacy compliance belongs here too. If you activate first-party audiences or measure outcomes, confirm you have appropriate consent and data processing terms, and prefer privacy-preserving pipes (clean rooms, aggregated reporting) over raw data movement.
Here’s a short list of non-negotiables you can paste into briefs and RFPs:
Legal & disclosure: confirm FTC-compliant claims and FCC loudness/clearance sign-off before traffic.
Supply integrity: require app-ads.txt/sellers.json and TAG-certified partners; avoid unidentified resellers.
Suitability & verification: set suitability to a documented framework (e.g., GARM) and mandate third-party IVT/suitability checks on CTV.
Contract clarity: fix the transaction currency, IVT thresholds, remediation terms, and data-use permissions in writing.
Handled this way, compliance and brand safety become protective rails rather than friction, preserving the advantages of TV while keeping your campaign—and your brand—out of avoidable trouble.
Conclusion: How to succeed with TV advertising buying
TV ad buying works when you treat it as one converged system. Plan for scale on linear, add precision on CTV, and hold yourself to a single source of truth for delivery and a cross-screen view for deduplicated reach and frequency. Lock currency and verification in the IO, steward quality and suitability like line items—not afterthoughts—and keep enough flexibility to move budget toward what’s working.
Here are five practical moves to put that into action:
Start with the KPI ladder. Decide whether the campaign must deliver unique reach, qualified actions, or sales lift—then choose currency, reporting, and optimization rules that match those goals.
Build a balanced mix. Use guaranteed linear or programmatic guaranteed for base reach, layer curated CTV for incremental reach and targeting, and reserve a modest scatter budget for timely opportunities.
Name the measurement stack early. Pick a transaction currency and a cross-platform, deduplicated view before RFPs go out; you’ll avoid painful reconciliation later.
Cap frequency across screens. Monitor the live distribution each week and reallocate to placements that add net-new reach; rotate creative when exposure bands climb.
Treat quality as ROI protection. Enforce app/channel disclosure, verification, and suitability settings on every CTV deal; document IVT thresholds and remedies in contracts.
If you’d like help applying these principles to your next plan—or want an outside read on pricing, currency, and optimization—reach out to the team at AI Digital. We’ll pressure-test your assumptions, model reach and frequency across screens, and engineer the buying mechanics to hit your goals with clarity and speed. Get in touch.
Blind spot
Key issues
Business impact
AI Digital solution
Lack of transparency in AI models
• Platforms own AI models and train on proprietary data • Brands have little visibility into decision-making • "Walled gardens" restrict data access
• Inefficient ad spend • Limited strategic control • Eroded consumer trust • Potential budget mismanagement
Open Garden framework providing: • Complete transparency • DSP-agnostic execution • Cross-platform data & insights
Optimizing ads vs. optimizing impact
• AI excels at short-term metrics but may struggle with brand building • Consumers can detect AI-generated content • Efficiency might come at cost of authenticity
• Short-term gains at expense of brand health • Potential loss of authentic connection • Reduced effectiveness in storytelling
Smart Supply offering: • Human oversight of AI recommendations • Custom KPI alignment beyond clicks • Brand-safe inventory verification
The illusion of personalization
• Segment optimization rebranded as personalization • First-party data infrastructure challenges • Personalization vs. surveillance concerns
• Potential mismatch between promise and reality • Privacy concerns affecting consumer trust • Cost barriers for smaller businesses
Elevate platform features: • Real-time AI + human intelligence • First-party data activation • Ethical personalization strategies
AI-Driven efficiency vs. decision-making
• AI shifting from tool to decision-maker • Black box optimization like Google Performance Max • Human oversight limitations
• Strategic control loss • Difficulty questioning AI outputs • Inability to measure granular impact • Potential brand damage from mistakes
Managed Service with: • Human strategists overseeing AI • Custom KPI optimization • Complete campaign transparency
Fig. 1. Summary of AI blind spots in advertising
Dimension
Walled garden advantage
Walled garden limitation
Strategic impact
Audience access
Massive, engaged user bases
Limited visibility beyond platform
Reach without understanding
Data control
Sophisticated targeting tools
Data remains siloed within platform
Fragmented customer view
Measurement
Detailed in-platform metrics
Inconsistent cross-platform standards
Difficult performance comparison
Intelligence
Platform-specific insights
Limited data portability
Restricted strategic learning
Optimization
Powerful automated tools
Black-box algorithms
Reduced marketer control
Fig. 2. Strategic trade-offs in walled garden advertising.
Core issue
Platform priority
Walled garden limitation
Real-world example
Attribution opacity
Claiming maximum credit for conversions
Limited visibility into true conversion paths
Meta and TikTok's conflicting attribution models after iOS privacy updates
Data restrictions
Maintaining proprietary data control
Inability to combine platform data with other sources
Amazon DSP's limitations on detailed performance data exports
Cross-channel blindspots
Keeping advertisers within ecosystem
Fragmented view of customer journey
YouTube/DV360 campaigns lacking integration with non-Google platforms
Black box algorithms
Optimizing for platform revenue
Reduced control over campaign execution
Self-serve platforms using opaque ML models with little advertiser input
Performance reporting
Presenting platform in best light
Discrepancies between platform-reported and independently measured results
Consistently higher performance metrics in platform reports vs. third-party measurement
Fig. 1. The Walled garden misalignment: Platform interests vs. advertiser needs.
Key dimension
Challenge
Strategic imperative
ROAS volatility
Softer returns across digital channels
Shift from soft KPIs to measurable revenue impact
Media planning
Static plans no longer effective
Develop agile, modular approaches adaptable to changing conditions
Brand/performance
Traditional division dissolving
Create full-funnel strategies balancing long-term equity with short-term conversion
Capability
Key features
Benefits
Performance data
Elevate forecasting tool
• Vertical-specific insights • Historical data from past economic turbulence • "Cascade planning" functionality • Real-time adaptation
• Provides agility to adjust campaign strategy based on performance • Shows which media channels work best to drive efficient and effective performance • Confident budget reallocation • Reduces reaction time to market shifts
• Dataset from 10,000+ campaigns • Cuts response time from weeks to minutes
• Reaches people most likely to buy • Avoids wasted impressions and budgets on poor-performing placements • Context-aligned messaging
• 25+ billion bid requests analyzed daily • 18% improvement in working media efficiency • 26% increase in engagement during recessions
Full-funnel accountability
• Links awareness campaigns to lower funnel outcomes • Tests if ads actually drive new business • Measures brand perception changes • "Ask Elevate" AI Chat Assistant
• Upper-funnel to outcome connection • Sentiment shift tracking • Personalized messaging • Helps balance immediate sales vs. long-term brand building
• Natural language data queries • True business impact measurement
Open Garden approach
• Cross-platform and channel planning • Not locked into specific platforms • Unified cross-platform reach • Shows exactly where money is spent
• Reduces complexity across channels • Performance-based ad placement • Rapid budget reallocation • Eliminates platform-specific commitments and provides platform-based optimization and agility
• Coverage across all inventory sources • Provides full visibility into spending • Avoids the inability to pivot across platform as you’re not in a singular platform
Fig. 1. How AI Digital helps during economic uncertainty.
Trend
What it means for marketers
Supply & demand lines are blurring
Platforms from Google (P-Max) to Microsoft are merging optimization and inventory in one opaque box. Expect more bundled “best available” media where the algorithm, not the trader, decides channel and publisher mix.
Walled gardens get taller
Microsoft’s O&O set now spans Bing, Xbox, Outlook, Edge and LinkedIn, which just launched revenue-sharing video programs to lure creators and ad dollars. (Business Insider)
Retail & commerce media shape strategy
Microsoft’s Curate lets retailers and data owners package first-party segments, an echo of Amazon’s and Walmart’s approaches. Agencies must master seller-defined audiences as well as buyer-side tactics.
AI oversight becomes critical
Closed AI bidding means fewer levers for traders. Independent verification, incrementality testing and commercial guardrails rise in importance.
Fig. 1. Platform trends and their implications.
Metric
Connected TV (CTV)
Linear TV
Video Completion Rate
94.5%
70%
Purchase Rate After Ad
23%
12%
Ad Attention Rate
57% (prefer CTV ads)
54.5%
Viewer Reach (U.S.)
85% of households
228 million viewers
Retail Media Trends 2025
Access Complete consumer behaviour analyses and competitor benchmarks.
Identify and categorize audience groups based on behaviors, preferences, and characteristics
Michaels Stores: Implemented a genAI platform that increased email personalization from 20% to 95%, leading to a 41% boost in SMS click through rates and a 25% increase in engagement.
Estée Lauder: Partnered with Google Cloud to leverage genAI technologies for real-time consumer feedback monitoring and analyzing consumer sentiment across various channels.
High
Medium
Automated ad campaigns
Automate ad creation, placement, and optimization across various platforms
Showmax: Partnered with AI firms toautomate ad creation and testing, reducing production time by 70% while streamlining their quality assurance process.
Headway: Employed AI tools for ad creation and optimization, boosting performance by 40% and reaching 3.3 billion impressions while incorporating AI-generated content in 20% of their paid campaigns.
High
High
Brand sentiment tracking
Monitor and analyze public opinion about a brand across multiple channels in real time
L’Oréal: Analyzed millions of online comments, images, and videos to identify potential product innovation opportunities, effectively tracking brand sentiment and consumer trends.
Kellogg Company: Used AI to scan trending recipes featuring cereal, leveraging this data to launch targeted social campaigns that capitalize on positive brand sentiment and culinary trends.
High
Low
Campaign strategy optimization
Analyze data to predict optimal campaign approaches, channels, and timing
DoorDash: Leveraged Google’s AI-powered Demand Gen tool, which boosted its conversion rate by 15 times and improved cost per action efficiency by 50% compared with previous campaigns.
Kitsch: Employed Meta’s Advantage+ shopping campaigns with AI-powered tools to optimize campaigns, identifying and delivering top-performing ads to high-value consumers.
High
High
Content strategy
Generate content ideas, predict performance, and optimize distribution strategies
JPMorgan Chase: Collaborated with Persado to develop LLMs for marketing copy, achieving up to 450% higher clickthrough rates compared with human-written ads in pilot tests.
Hotel Chocolat: Employed genAI for concept development and production of its Velvetiser TV ad, which earned the highest-ever System1 score for adomestic appliance commercial.
High
High
Personalization strategy development
Create tailored messaging and experiences for consumers at scale
Stitch Fix: Uses genAI to help stylists interpret customer feedback and provide product recommendations, effectively personalizing shopping experiences.
Instacart: Uses genAI to offer customers personalized recipes, mealplanning ideas, and shopping lists based on individual preferences and habits.
Medium
Medium
Share article
Url copied to clipboard
No items found.
Subscribe to our Newsletter
THANK YOU FOR YOUR SUBSCRIPTION
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Questions? We have answers
What is online media buying?
Online media buying is the practice of purchasing digital ad inventory—display, online video, CTV/OTT, social, search—using impression-based pricing (usually CPM) and platform tools to target, deliver, and measure ads across the web.
How does programmatic media buying work?
Programmatic uses software to automate buying. You set audience, budget, bids, frequency caps, and brand-safety rules; a DSP then bids in real time (or via programmatic guaranteed) to win impressions across approved inventory, optimizing toward your KPIs.
How to use AI in media buying?
Use AI to forecast reach and overlap, detect pacing or quality anomalies, rebalance budgets toward placements that add incremental reach, and rotate creative based on performance. Keep a human in the loop to set guardrails and validate outcomes.
What is a media buying service?
It’s a specialist partner (often an agency) that converts your plan into deals and delivery: negotiating price and terms, trafficking creative, monitoring performance, managing makegoods, and reconciling results against the chosen currency and KPIs.
What is the difference between TV media buying and planning?
Planning defines the strategy—objectives, audiences, channel mix, KPIs, and measurement. Buying executes that strategy—selects partners, negotiates rates and placements, activates campaigns, controls quality and frequency, and reports results.
Have other questions?
If you have more questions, contact us so we can help.