Real-Time Bidding (RTB) vs. Programmatic Advertising: Why the Comparison Is Misleading (But Useful to Understand)
Mary Gabrielyan
September 29, 2025
13
minutes read
RTB is not a rival to programmatic advertising; it is one of its buying methods. The confusion starts when “programmatic” gets used as shorthand for every automated transaction. This article separates the umbrella from the auction, then shows when each buying path makes sense.
Marketers often compare RTB and programmatic as if they were peers. They are not. Programmatic is the broader system of automated ad buying that includes several transaction types. RTB is the auction-based approach inside that system, where individual impressions are priced and purchased in real time. Understanding that hierarchy makes the rest of the conversation straightforward.
Why does the distinction matter? Because buying model choice drives outcomes. Programmatic direct and preferred deals offer price certainty, known supply, and delivery guarantees. Open exchange RTB offers scale, dynamic pricing, and impression-level controls, with more diligence required on transparency and supply quality. Private marketplaces sit between the two. Your mix will depend on goal, budget certainty, brand safety requirements, and the channels you plan to use.
What you will find here: concise definitions, a walk-through of how RTB operates inside programmatic platforms (DSPs, SSPs, and exchanges), a side-by-side comparison of buying models, and a balanced view of benefits and limitations. We will also map common use cases by channel and provide decision cues you can apply to your next brief.
What is programmatic advertising?
Programmatic advertising is the automated buying and selling of digital ad inventory using software. Instead of negotiating one-to-one with individual publishers, advertisers set objectives, budgets, and targeting rules in a platform, and the system executes the buy across many sites, apps, and channels in near-real time. It’s an approach, not a single product: the pipes move impressions, the data informs decisions, and the software decides where and when your ad appears.
How it works at a high level:
Demand-side platform (DSP): the advertiser’s console. You set goals, audiences, bids, budgets, pacing, frequency, and creative rotation. The DSP evaluates each available impression against your rules and decides whether to bid.
Supply-side platform (SSP): the publisher’s console. It packages inventory, sets floors, applies brand-safety controls, and exposes impressions to demand through exchanges and direct connections.
Ad exchange/marketplace: the neutral venue where buyers and sellers meet. It runs auctions, enforces auction rules, and returns the winning ad in milliseconds.
Data management platform (DMP) or customer data platform (CDP): the data layer. It ingests first-party and approved third-party data, builds segments, and passes signals to the DSP for targeting and measurement.
A simplified flow looks like this: a user loads a page or opens an app → the SSP sends a bid request describing the impression → eligible DSPs score the opportunity using your targeting and performance models → the exchange selects a winner → the ad is served and measured.
Main types of programmatic buying:
Real-time bidding (RTB): auction-based buying on an impression-by-impression basis. Pricing is dynamic; access is broad (open exchange) or curated (invite-only auctions).
Programmatic direct (programmatic guaranteed): a one-to-one, fixed-price, guaranteed deal executed through programmatic pipes. You agree on placement, price, and volume with the publisher, then deliver through the DSP/SSP connection.
Preferred deals: a fixed-price, non-guaranteed arrangement that gives the buyer priority access to a publisher’s inventory before it goes to auction. If you pass, the impression can enter an RTB auction.
Private marketplaces (PMPs): invite-only auctions run by a publisher or exchange. You get curated, higher-quality supply and clearer terms than the open exchange while retaining auction flexibility.
Real-time bidding is an auction-based method inside programmatic advertising where individual ad impressions are bought and sold one at a time. Each time a page or app loads, eligible buyers compete in a rapid auction to decide which ad appears. Pricing is dynamic: the winning bid sets the price for that impression.
⚡All RTB is programmatic; not all programmatic uses RTB.
How the auction works:
A user opens a page or app. The publisher’s ad server/SSP creates a bid request describing the impression (context, device, and permitted audience signals).
The ad exchange forwards that request to demand-side platforms (DSPs) representing advertisers.
Each DSP evaluates the opportunity against targeting rules, first-party data, and predictive models, then returns a bid and an ad creative.
The exchange runs a first-price auction with any applicable floors and deals. The highest eligible bid wins.
The winning creative is served and measured. All of this completes within milliseconds.
A quick example:
An apparel retailer wants to re-engage cart abandoners. A shopper who left a pair of sneakers in their cart later visits a recipe site. The SSP sends a bid request. The retailer’s DSP recognizes the user in its retargeting segment, values the impression highly, and bids aggressively. It wins the auction, and the user sees a dynamic ad featuring the exact sneakers with a limited-time offer. If the user clicks and completes the purchase, the DSP records the conversion and updates future bid strategies.
How RTB works inside programmatic platforms
RTB is the auction rail inside the broader programmatic stack. A single impression becomes available; platforms exchange a standardized “bid request”; eligible buyers value the opportunity and respond; the exchange selects a winner and returns the creative—all in the time it takes a page or app screen to load. The IAB Tech Lab’s OpenRTB protocol defines that request/response handshake so buyers and sellers can transact at machine speed.
Pre-auction setup (controls on both sides):
Publisher side (SSP/ad server): packages inventory, applies floor prices, brand-safety rules, and deal terms (e.g., PMPs with specific buyers). Private deals and PMPs are carried on the bidstream via deal IDs, which tell bidders that an impression is subject to pre-arranged terms.
Advertiser side (DSP): ingests first-party segments and approved third-party/contextual signals, sets pacing, frequency caps, and bidding logic. The DSP will only consider bid requests that match campaign rules. (OpenRTB standardizes fields for user, device, site/app, and impression objects so this evaluation is consistent.)
The real-time exchange (step by step):
A user opens a page or app; the publisher’s ad server/SSP creates a bid request describing the impression and permitted signals.
The ad exchange/marketplace forwards that request to multiple DSPs.
Each DSP scores the opportunity against targeting and performance models, then replies with a bid and creative metadata.
The exchange runs the auction and selects the eligible highest bid; the winning creative is returned to the ad server and rendered.
OpenRTB is the common language that enables this flow across vendors.
Auction mechanics have shifted to first-price: Most major exchanges—including Google Ad Manager—moved from second-price to first-price auctions, meaning the winner pays what they bid (subject to floors and deal terms). This simplifies pricing and changed bidder strategy industry-wide.
⚡ First-price auctions reward smart bids, not high bids.
How bidders decide (and avoid overpaying): Modern DSPs combine rules and machine learning to predict win probability and expected value. In first-price environments, many employ bid shading—algorithms that reduce a bid just enough to maintain a strong chance of winning without paying more than necessary.
Quality, transparency, and measurement safeguards:
ads.txt / app-ads.txt and sellers.json let buyers verify authorized sellers and see who’s in the supply chain—core defenses against spoofed inventory and opaque paths.
Open Measurement SDK (OMSDK/OMID) standardizes viewability and verification signals across web video, in-app, and CTV, so buyers can measure what they win.
Supply-path optimization (SPO) trims redundant hops and favors cleaner, more direct routes to inventory, improving efficiency and transparency.
Where header bidding fits: Before the ad server makes its decision, many publishers run header bidding to solicit bids from multiple partners in parallel, then pass the best candidates into the ad server call. Prebid (the open-source framework) documents how publishers balance bid collection with user experience via timeouts to keep pages responsive.
Putting it together with a simple path: User opens an app → SSP creates a bid request (with any applicable deal IDs) → exchange fans it out to DSPs → DSPs evaluate and bid → exchange runs a first-price auction → winner returns the creative → OM SDK/verification tags measure viewability and fraud signals → reporting flows back to buyer and seller.
⚡ This is the machinery your campaigns ride on: a standardized protocol (OpenRTB), auctions that now clear at first price, bidder algorithms tuned for value, and guardrails that keep supply legitimate and measurable.
RTB within programmatic: the real relationship
A quick orientation helps before we get into the details. Programmatic is the overall system for automated buying across channels and deal types, while RTB is the auction rail inside that system. The next sections clarify their scope, how the buying models differ, how data is applied, and what that means for transparency and control.
⚡Programmatic is the operating system; RTB is one of its apps.
Scope
Programmatic is the umbrella term for automated ad buying across channels and formats. It includes auction-based buying and non-auction deals executed through the same pipes. RTB is one method inside that umbrella—the auction rail that prices and purchases impressions one at a time in real time.
Open exchange RTB: impression-level auctions with broad access.
Private marketplaces (PMPs): invite-only auctions with curated supply and floor prices.
Preferred deals: fixed CPM without guarantees; the buyer gets first look before an impression goes to auction.
Programmatic direct (programmatic guaranteed): fixed price and guaranteed delivery via programmatic pipes.
RTB, by contrast, is auction-only. It covers open exchanges and PMPs where price is discovered per impression.
Data and targeting
Programmatic integrates advanced data across the campaign lifecycle—audience building in a CDP/DMP, creative decisioning, cross-channel frequency, and outcome measurement. RTB applies those same signals at the bid decision for each impression, with an emphasis on price discovery, competitiveness, and delivery efficiency in the auction.
⚡ In short: programmatic = broader data orchestration; RTB = impression-level decisioning that leans on data to value and win the right moments.
Transparency and control
With programmatic direct and PMPs, buyers and publishers set clear terms: known inventory, negotiated pricing, and tighter brand-safety guardrails. Open-exchange RTB offers unmatched reach and flexibility, but control and transparency can vary by supply path and settings. Modern DSP capabilities—brand-safety filters, supply-path optimization, log-level reporting, and AI-assisted bidding—help close the gap.
The table below lines up programmatic (the umbrella) against RTB (the auction method) across scope, buying types, pricing, guarantees, data use, transparency and control, inventory access, best fit, and key risks. Use it as a reference while you plan which rails to use for your brief.
Benefits and limitations of RTB programmatic advertising
Before we get into specifics, it helps to separate the two layers. First, we’ll outline the benefits and limitations of programmatic advertising—the overall operating system for automated buying—then we’ll do the same for RTB, the auction method inside it. Where possible, we’ll quantify the upside and the trade-offs so you can weigh certainty, scale, cost, and control.
Programmatic advertising
Programmatic operates as the buying and measurement layer across channels. Below is what it does well—and where it introduces trade-offs.
Benefits
These advantages are most visible when you coordinate channels in one plan, keep frequency in check, and feed the system clean first-party and contextual data.
Scale and coverage. Programmatic is now the default way U.S. marketers buy digital display. In 2024 it captured 91.3% of display ad dollars, and programmatic display growth outpaced nonprogrammatic by roughly 3x in 2024.
Programmatic vs non-programmatic display ad spending (Source).
Omnichannel access. Programmatic buying isn’t just banners. In digital out-of-home, programmatic DOOH reached 26.4% of U.S. DOOH spend in 2024 and is forecast to keep expanding; U.S. programmatic DOOH was about $850 million in 2024 and is projected to reach $1.23 billion by 2026.
CTV adoption. On connected TV, about three-quarters of transactions are now programmatic (2024), with buyers citing easier optimization, better ROI/ROAS, frequency control, and the ability to append first- and third-party data as top reasons.
% of CTV advertising by transaction type (Source).
Budget agility. Programmatic lets you shift budget quickly toward channels and placements that are working. In digital video overall, spend rose 15% in 2023 and was projected to grow 16% in 2024, with programmatic cited for cross-platform activation and measurement advantages.
Limitations
These are the pressure points to watch. Most can be contained with curated supply paths, strong verification, clear inclusion lists, and disciplined measurement.
Transparency and waste. Despite progress, a sizable share of programmatic spend still fails quality thresholds. The ANA’s benchmark shows 41% of programmatic budgets delivered “effective ad impressions” in Q1 2025, up from 36% in 2023. The same work documents a sharp drop in spend on “made-for-advertising” sites from ~15% (2023) to ~0.4% (2025) among participants.
Signal loss and privacy headwinds. U.S. decision-makers overwhelmingly expect continued data signal loss and new state privacy laws, which constrain audience addressability and measurement in programmatic environments.
Auction complexity. The ecosystem’s move to first-price auctions simplified clearing but increased the need for smarter bidding and bid shading to avoid overpaying.
Real-time bidding (RTB)
RTB is the impression-by-impression auction rail. Here’s where it shines and where you’ll want extra guardrails.
Benefits
You’ll see the most upside when bidding logic is tied to clear outcomes, first-party data is in play, and creative testing is continuous.
Granular price discovery. RTB prices each impression dynamically, which helps avoid overpaying for low-value inventory and concentrate spend on moments with higher conversion probability. Evidence from CTV buyers underscores why auction-based programmatic is attractive: respondents highlight easier optimization, better ROI/ROAS, scalable reach, frequency control, and data appends as leading benefits.
Performance use cases at scale. RTB’s impression-level decisions power retargeting, prospecting, and event- or geo-triggered bursts across open exchange supply, PMPs, and programmatic CTV—helpful when you need quick reach and rapid learning cycles. (See the programmatic CTV statistic above for adoption context.)
Limitations
These are the trade-offs inherent to open auctions. Tackle them with curated supply, strict brand safety settings, measured frequency, and close readouts.
Quality variance in open markets. Open-exchange RTB delivers reach but requires tighter controls. Even with recent gains, ANA’s analysis indicates that a majority of spend still does not meet “effective impression” criteria, and MFA exposure required active reduction by sophisticated buyers. Use allowlists, ads.txt/app-ads.txt, and SPO to improve outcomes.
Price volatility. First-price dynamics can push CPMs up on in-demand audiences or premium contexts, which makes disciplined bid strategies and pacing essential.
Measurement and signal challenges. RTB’s strengths rely on timely signals. As privacy-by-design expands, buyers report measurement pain points and greater reliance on modeled approaches in video and CTV.
Measurement—one of the biggest challenges in ad buying (Source).
Bottom line: programmatic gives you the operating system for automated media across channels; RTB is the auction rail that supplies reach and speed.
⚡ Use programmatic direct and PMPs when you need certainty and control, and lean on RTB when you need flexible scale and fast optimization—then monitor supply paths and measurement rigorously.
Use cases for programmatic and RTB
Here’s how to choose the right rail for the job. Start with the outcome and channels you must secure, then decide what to reserve and what to leave to auctions. The sections below show where programmatic direct, PMPs, and open RTB each make the most sense.
When programmatic advertising is the better fit
Use programmatic when you need orchestration across channels and certainty about where and how you show up.
Multi-channel reach and continuity. One plan, many pipes—display, video/CTV, audio, mobile in-app, and DOOH—with unified pacing, frequency, and reporting.
Large-scale brand campaigns. Secure premium inventory via programmatic guaranteed or preferred deals, then layer curated PMPs for quality reach across trusted publishers.
Context and control. Regulated categories, strict brand-safety requirements, or publisher-specific alignments benefit from known supply and negotiated terms.
CTV reservations and sponsorships. Lock in must-have placements or dayparts, and run creative flighting without auction volatility.
When RTB is the better fit
Choose RTB when every impression should be valued on the fly and you want speed, scale, and learning loops.
Performance-driven acquisition. Prospecting and retargeting that optimize toward conversions, leads, or ROAS with impression-level bidding.
Budget-conscious buys. Dynamic price discovery helps concentrate spend on high-value moments and avoid overpaying for low-value ones.
Short-term activations. Event, daypart, or geo-triggered bursts (e.g., weather spikes, stadium exits, store openings) that need to spin up and down quickly.
Creative testing at pace. Rapid A/B/C of messages, formats, and audiences with immediate feedback from the bidstream.
⚡Reserve what you must have; let auctions find the rest.
Why a hybrid approach often wins
Most plans get better when you combine the strengths of both:
Use programmatic direct to guarantee presence in premium environments and shape the context for your story.
Use PMPs to extend quality reach with transparency and negotiated floors.
Use open-exchange RTB to find incremental audiences at scale and to retarget efficiently.
Unify frequency caps, attribution, and budgeting in the DSP so each rail supports the others rather than competing.
Improve auction efficiency and results by using Smart Supply’s outcome-focused deal IDs that favor direct, high-performing routes and neutralize platform bias, paired with allowlists, ads.txt/app-ads.txt checks, and supply-path optimization.
Two quick examples
Consider the following hypothetical scenarios:
National auto launch. The brand secures programmatic-guaranteed CTV with key streaming partners and a set of homepage takeovers for launch week. PMPs cover auto reviewers and enthusiast sites. Open-exchange RTB adds prospecting against in-market segments and retargets configurator visitors with dynamic creative. Result: guaranteed visibility for the reveal, plus efficient lower-funnel reach that keeps test-drive signups flowing after the splash.
D2C apparel sprint. A retailer runs RTB prospecting on look-alike audiences and retargets cart abandoners across mobile web and in-app. Budgets surge around payday weekends and cool-weather forecasts in priority DMAs. To keep quality high, the team buys through curated marketplaces and Smart Supply routes, then tightens frequency caps as conversion rates normalize. Result: steady CPA at modest budgets, with fast creative learnings feeding the next drop.
⚡ The rule of thumb: reserve what you can’t afford to miss, then let auctions find the rest.
For real-word outcomes, consider the following case studies:
Boiron’s Oscillococcinum campaign used The Trade Desk’s DSP with Kroger’s retail data to find and measure new households in the U.S. Running across programmatic channels, the effort delivered 2.67× ROAS, reached more than 1.9 million households, and—critically for growth—94% were new to the brand.
In automotive, a recent Tier-2 Honda effort applied programmatic CTV with Strategus’ SalesLink attribution powered by Experian Outcomes. Against a control group it produced a 133% lift in vehicle sales; CTV exposure alone drove a 237% lift. The campaign also generated a 3,871% increase in qualified site visits and a 971% lift in dealership foot traffic, demonstrating how auction-based buying can pair with closed-loop measurement to prove business impact.
Conclusion on programmatic advertising vs RTB
Programmatic advertising is the broader system; RTB is one buying method within it. Programmatic includes fixed-price, guaranteed deals and invite-only marketplaces alongside open auctions. RTB powers impression-by-impression price discovery through those auctions.
The best choice is situational: if you need placement certainty and contextual control, programmatic direct or curated PMPs fit; if you need flexible scale, rapid optimization, or retargeting at pace, RTB delivers. Most effective plans blend both, reserving what you can’t afford to miss and letting auctions find incremental reach.
Looking ahead, the center of gravity continues to be data-driven programmatic. Privacy changes and signal loss raise the bar for first-party data use, contextual intelligence, supply curation, and measurement. Expect stronger identity-light tactics, cleaner supply paths, and smarter bidding to shape how budgets work across display, video/CTV, audio, mobile, and DOOH. RTB will remain essential for speed and learning, while non-auction deals will secure quality and predictability.
If you want a partner to implement this mix, AI Digital offers a DSP-agnostic managed service, Smart Supply for premium, curated inventory with transparent paths, and Elevate for planning and optimization—all within our Open Garden approach to control and clarity. Reach out to discuss a program tailored to your KPIs and channels.
Blind spot
Key issues
Business impact
AI Digital solution
Lack of transparency in AI models
• Platforms own AI models and train on proprietary data • Brands have little visibility into decision-making • "Walled gardens" restrict data access
• Inefficient ad spend • Limited strategic control • Eroded consumer trust • Potential budget mismanagement
Open Garden framework providing: • Complete transparency • DSP-agnostic execution • Cross-platform data & insights
Optimizing ads vs. optimizing impact
• AI excels at short-term metrics but may struggle with brand building • Consumers can detect AI-generated content • Efficiency might come at cost of authenticity
• Short-term gains at expense of brand health • Potential loss of authentic connection • Reduced effectiveness in storytelling
Smart Supply offering: • Human oversight of AI recommendations • Custom KPI alignment beyond clicks • Brand-safe inventory verification
The illusion of personalization
• Segment optimization rebranded as personalization • First-party data infrastructure challenges • Personalization vs. surveillance concerns
• Potential mismatch between promise and reality • Privacy concerns affecting consumer trust • Cost barriers for smaller businesses
Elevate platform features: • Real-time AI + human intelligence • First-party data activation • Ethical personalization strategies
AI-Driven efficiency vs. decision-making
• AI shifting from tool to decision-maker • Black box optimization like Google Performance Max • Human oversight limitations
• Strategic control loss • Difficulty questioning AI outputs • Inability to measure granular impact • Potential brand damage from mistakes
Managed Service with: • Human strategists overseeing AI • Custom KPI optimization • Complete campaign transparency
Fig. 1. Summary of AI blind spots in advertising
Dimension
Walled garden advantage
Walled garden limitation
Strategic impact
Audience access
Massive, engaged user bases
Limited visibility beyond platform
Reach without understanding
Data control
Sophisticated targeting tools
Data remains siloed within platform
Fragmented customer view
Measurement
Detailed in-platform metrics
Inconsistent cross-platform standards
Difficult performance comparison
Intelligence
Platform-specific insights
Limited data portability
Restricted strategic learning
Optimization
Powerful automated tools
Black-box algorithms
Reduced marketer control
Fig. 2. Strategic trade-offs in walled garden advertising.
Core issue
Platform priority
Walled garden limitation
Real-world example
Attribution opacity
Claiming maximum credit for conversions
Limited visibility into true conversion paths
Meta and TikTok's conflicting attribution models after iOS privacy updates
Data restrictions
Maintaining proprietary data control
Inability to combine platform data with other sources
Amazon DSP's limitations on detailed performance data exports
Cross-channel blindspots
Keeping advertisers within ecosystem
Fragmented view of customer journey
YouTube/DV360 campaigns lacking integration with non-Google platforms
Black box algorithms
Optimizing for platform revenue
Reduced control over campaign execution
Self-serve platforms using opaque ML models with little advertiser input
Performance reporting
Presenting platform in best light
Discrepancies between platform-reported and independently measured results
Consistently higher performance metrics in platform reports vs. third-party measurement
Fig. 1. The Walled garden misalignment: Platform interests vs. advertiser needs.
Key dimension
Challenge
Strategic imperative
ROAS volatility
Softer returns across digital channels
Shift from soft KPIs to measurable revenue impact
Media planning
Static plans no longer effective
Develop agile, modular approaches adaptable to changing conditions
Brand/performance
Traditional division dissolving
Create full-funnel strategies balancing long-term equity with short-term conversion
Capability
Key features
Benefits
Performance data
Elevate forecasting tool
• Vertical-specific insights • Historical data from past economic turbulence • "Cascade planning" functionality • Real-time adaptation
• Provides agility to adjust campaign strategy based on performance • Shows which media channels work best to drive efficient and effective performance • Confident budget reallocation • Reduces reaction time to market shifts
• Dataset from 10,000+ campaigns • Cuts response time from weeks to minutes
• Reaches people most likely to buy • Avoids wasted impressions and budgets on poor-performing placements • Context-aligned messaging
• 25+ billion bid requests analyzed daily • 18% improvement in working media efficiency • 26% increase in engagement during recessions
Full-funnel accountability
• Links awareness campaigns to lower funnel outcomes • Tests if ads actually drive new business • Measures brand perception changes • "Ask Elevate" AI Chat Assistant
• Upper-funnel to outcome connection • Sentiment shift tracking • Personalized messaging • Helps balance immediate sales vs. long-term brand building
• Natural language data queries • True business impact measurement
Open Garden approach
• Cross-platform and channel planning • Not locked into specific platforms • Unified cross-platform reach • Shows exactly where money is spent
• Reduces complexity across channels • Performance-based ad placement • Rapid budget reallocation • Eliminates platform-specific commitments and provides platform-based optimization and agility
• Coverage across all inventory sources • Provides full visibility into spending • Avoids the inability to pivot across platform as you’re not in a singular platform
Fig. 1. How AI Digital helps during economic uncertainty.
Trend
What it means for marketers
Supply & demand lines are blurring
Platforms from Google (P-Max) to Microsoft are merging optimization and inventory in one opaque box. Expect more bundled “best available” media where the algorithm, not the trader, decides channel and publisher mix.
Walled gardens get taller
Microsoft’s O&O set now spans Bing, Xbox, Outlook, Edge and LinkedIn, which just launched revenue-sharing video programs to lure creators and ad dollars. (Business Insider)
Retail & commerce media shape strategy
Microsoft’s Curate lets retailers and data owners package first-party segments, an echo of Amazon’s and Walmart’s approaches. Agencies must master seller-defined audiences as well as buyer-side tactics.
AI oversight becomes critical
Closed AI bidding means fewer levers for traders. Independent verification, incrementality testing and commercial guardrails rise in importance.
Fig. 1. Platform trends and their implications.
Metric
Connected TV (CTV)
Linear TV
Video Completion Rate
94.5%
70%
Purchase Rate After Ad
23%
12%
Ad Attention Rate
57% (prefer CTV ads)
54.5%
Viewer Reach (U.S.)
85% of households
228 million viewers
Retail Media Trends 2025
Access Complete consumer behaviour analyses and competitor benchmarks.
Identify and categorize audience groups based on behaviors, preferences, and characteristics
Michaels Stores: Implemented a genAI platform that increased email personalization from 20% to 95%, leading to a 41% boost in SMS click through rates and a 25% increase in engagement.
Estée Lauder: Partnered with Google Cloud to leverage genAI technologies for real-time consumer feedback monitoring and analyzing consumer sentiment across various channels.
High
Medium
Automated ad campaigns
Automate ad creation, placement, and optimization across various platforms
Showmax: Partnered with AI firms toautomate ad creation and testing, reducing production time by 70% while streamlining their quality assurance process.
Headway: Employed AI tools for ad creation and optimization, boosting performance by 40% and reaching 3.3 billion impressions while incorporating AI-generated content in 20% of their paid campaigns.
High
High
Brand sentiment tracking
Monitor and analyze public opinion about a brand across multiple channels in real time
L’Oréal: Analyzed millions of online comments, images, and videos to identify potential product innovation opportunities, effectively tracking brand sentiment and consumer trends.
Kellogg Company: Used AI to scan trending recipes featuring cereal, leveraging this data to launch targeted social campaigns that capitalize on positive brand sentiment and culinary trends.
High
Low
Campaign strategy optimization
Analyze data to predict optimal campaign approaches, channels, and timing
DoorDash: Leveraged Google’s AI-powered Demand Gen tool, which boosted its conversion rate by 15 times and improved cost per action efficiency by 50% compared with previous campaigns.
Kitsch: Employed Meta’s Advantage+ shopping campaigns with AI-powered tools to optimize campaigns, identifying and delivering top-performing ads to high-value consumers.
High
High
Content strategy
Generate content ideas, predict performance, and optimize distribution strategies
JPMorgan Chase: Collaborated with Persado to develop LLMs for marketing copy, achieving up to 450% higher clickthrough rates compared with human-written ads in pilot tests.
Hotel Chocolat: Employed genAI for concept development and production of its Velvetiser TV ad, which earned the highest-ever System1 score for adomestic appliance commercial.
High
High
Personalization strategy development
Create tailored messaging and experiences for consumers at scale
Stitch Fix: Uses genAI to help stylists interpret customer feedback and provide product recommendations, effectively personalizing shopping experiences.
Instacart: Uses genAI to offer customers personalized recipes, mealplanning ideas, and shopping lists based on individual preferences and habits.
Medium
Medium
Share article
Url copied to clipboard
No items found.
Subscribe to our Newsletter
THANK YOU FOR YOUR SUBSCRIPTION
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Questions? We have answers
What does the acronym RTB stand for (full form of RTB)?
RTB stands for real-time bidding, the auction method that prices and purchases individual ad impressions as they become available.
Is real time bidding a form of programmatic advertising?
Yes. RTB is one buying method within programmatic advertising. All RTB is programmatic, but not all programmatic buying uses RTB.
Which types of platforms support RTB?
RTB advertising runs across demand-side platforms (DSPs) on the buy side, supply-side platforms (SSPs) on the sell side, and the ad exchanges/marketplaces that connect them. Many publisher ad servers and mobile/CTV mediation stacks plug into these auctions as well.
RTB programmatic and programmatic RTB: what's the difference?
They’re the same phrasing; both refer to real-time bidding within programmatic advertising. Programmatic is the umbrella for automated buying (open auctions, private marketplaces, preferred deals, and programmatic guaranteed). RTB is just the auction rail inside that umbrella—use it for flexible, impression-level price discovery; use direct/PMPs when you need guaranteed placements and price certainty.
How does programmatic bidding work?
An SSP sends a bid request when an impression becomes available. The request fans out through an exchange to DSPs, which evaluate it against your targeting and goals, return a bid and creative, and the exchange selects a winner in a first-price auction. The ad is then served and measured within milliseconds.
Can you run programmatic advertising without RTB?
Yes. Programmatic direct (programmatic guaranteed), preferred deals, and private marketplaces allow programmatic execution without open-exchange auctions for every impression. These models use the same pipes but provide fixed pricing or invite-only access.
What is RTB programmatic buying?
RTB programmatic buying is the auction-based method inside programmatic advertising where individual impressions are bid on and purchased in real time via DSPs, SSPs, and ad exchanges. Each bid decision happens in milliseconds using audience, context, and performance signals to set a price for that single impression. It’s best for flexible scale and performance (prospecting, retargeting), while programmatic direct/PMPs cover fixed-price or guaranteed buys.
Have other questions?
If you have more questions, contact us so we can help.